This dissertation was performed at the Faculty of Management and
Organization, Centre for Development Studies (CDS),the Faculty of Economics
of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, and the School of Economics
and Business Administration (SEBA) of Cantho University in Vietnam.
Numerous institutions, organizations and individuals contributed to this
dissertation in one way or another, such as financial, intellectual, logistical and
moral support. For this reason, it is my pleasure to express my thanks.
First, I would like to extend my gratitude to NUFFIC organization and the
University of Groningen for their financial supportand to Cantho University as
well as SEBA for giving me the study leave to pursue a Ph.D. programme.
On the intellectual side, this dissertation could have never seen the light of the
day without the unstinting support and encouragement of my promotors
Professor J. Wijngaard and Professor A.C. Waszink from the Faculty of
Management and Organization. I would like to express my profound gratitude
for opening the door for me to become a PhD candidate at this faculty. Without
both of you, I would never have had that opportunity. I deeply thank you for
your weekly supervision. I have enjoyed our discussions and have learned a
great deal from you. My special thanks are devoted to Professor A.G. M.
Steerneman for your statistical professional guidance and crucial comments. All
three of you provide me with the freedom to exploreresearch directions and
choose the routes that I wanted to investigate. I would also like to thank
Professor C.T.B. Ahaus, Professor S.W.F. Omta, and Professor C. Schweigman
for reading my manuscript and for giving me critical comments.
247 trang |
Chia sẻ: ngtr9097 | Lượt xem: 2103 | Lượt tải: 4
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu The Shrimp Supply Chain Quality Improvement Perspective of Seafood Companies in the Mekong Delta,Vietnam, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Seafood Supply Chain Quality Management:
The Shrimp Supply Chain Quality Improvement
Perspective of Seafood Companies in the Mekong Delta,
Vietnam
Vo Thi Thanh Loc
Centre for Development Studies
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Dierenriemstraat 100
9742 AK Groningen
The Netherlands
ISBN 90-367-2670-0
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Seafood Supply Chain Quality Management:
The Shrimp Supply Chain Quality Improvement
Perspective of Seafood Companies in the Mekong Delta,
Vietnam
Proefschrift
ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de
Bedrijfskunde
aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
op gezag van de
Rector Magnificus, dr. F. Zwarts,
in het openbaar te verdedigen op
donderdag 26 june 2006
om 13.15 uur
door
Vo Thi Thanh Loc
geboren op May 20, 1963
te Tien Giang (Vietnam)
Promotores: Prof. Dr. J. Wijngaard
Prof. Ir. A.C. Waszink
Beoordelingscommissie: Prof. Dr. Ir. C.T.B. Ahaus
Prof. Dr. S.W.F. Omta
Prof. Dr. Ir. C. Schweigman
Acknowledgements
This dissertation was performed at the Faculty of Management and
Organization, Centre for Development Studies (CDS), the Faculty of Economics
of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, and the School of Economics
and Business Administration (SEBA) of Cantho University in Vietnam.
Numerous institutions, organizations and individuals contributed to this
dissertation in one way or another, such as financial, intellectual, logistical and
moral support. For this reason, it is my pleasure to express my thanks.
First, I would like to extend my gratitude to NUFFIC organization and the
University of Groningen for their financial support and to Cantho University as
well as SEBA for giving me the study leave to pursue a Ph.D. programme.
On the intellectual side, this dissertation could have never seen the light of the
day without the unstinting support and encouragement of my promotors
Professor J. Wijngaard and Professor A.C. Waszink from the Faculty of
Management and Organization. I would like to express my profound gratitude
for opening the door for me to become a PhD candidate at this faculty. Without
both of you, I would never have had that opportunity. I deeply thank you for
your weekly supervision. I have enjoyed our discussions and have learned a
great deal from you. My special thanks are devoted to Professor A.G. M.
Steerneman for your statistical professional guidance and crucial comments. All
three of you provide me with the freedom to explore research directions and
choose the routes that I wanted to investigate. I would also like to thank
Professor C.T.B. Ahaus, Professor S.W.F. Omta, and Professor C. Schweigman
for reading my manuscript and for giving me critical comments.
I sincerely thank all of the executive board members of 32 Seafood Companies
in the MD for your information, data and hospitality. I am also grateful to all
employees of company A and Company B for your assistance in testing the
quality management framework and in having your feedback on the quality
improvement plan. My special thanks will go to Mr. Tuong, Mr. Hieu, Ms. Nga,
Mr. Ky, Mr. Ba Dung, and Mr. Dung. Without your support, this work would
not have been undertaken.
I especially thank Ms. Hong Minh, the deputy of Fisheries Industry; Mr. Dinh
Hoe, the deputy head of VASEP in Ho Chi Minh City; Mr. Nguyen Chinh, the
director of the NAFIQAVED branch in Cantho for all your information,
comments and support. I would like to extend my gratitude to all members of
local Agricultural departments and those of the shrimp supply chain for your
ii
support and information. The dissertation benefited from the secondary data and
information provided especially by Mr. Thang, Mr. Tung, Mr. Quan, Ms. Tuyet,
Ms. Thu Van and Mr. Thong in the provinces.
I would like to thank Madeleine C. Gardeur, Erik Haarbrink, Gonny Lakerveld,
Wiebe Zijlstra, Renny Kooi, Frans Tempelaar, Reike Tempelaar, Ger Lanjouw,
Leidy Lanjouw, Pieter Boele, Blaine A. Thacker, Huong Nguyen Thu and
Arthur de Boer for your help in different occasions. Anita Veltmaat and Richard
Hughes deserve some extra words of thanks as you devoted much of your time
to the correction of the first English version of this dissertation.
While conducting the thesis, I also obtained helps from my colleagues Thu Tra,
Thanh Be, Sanh, Nghia, Hanh, Dong Loc-Diem, Doan Khoi, Sinh-Khuyen,
Hien, Tuyet, Thanh Quan, Tan Loc, Thanh Trieu, Bich-Phat, Hong Nhung. I
would like to express my gratitude to all that you did for me. And, I really would
like to thank all my other colleagues at SEBA for helping to cover my duty at
the School.
I am grateful to my close friends Duy Nguyen, Phu Son, Minh Yen, Hong-Tung,
and Peter Bodde for your sympathy, love, and support when I faced problems in
my study and in my life.
I am also indebted to a few anonymous contributors and supporters whose
constructive suggestions led to improvements in this book.
Last but not least, though words may fail to express how I feel, I wish to thank
my family members who took the burden of family responsibility while I was
away from home. All of you supported and encouraged me so that I could
concentrate on my studies. Also, I wish to express my gratitude to my mother
and my siblings for their continual support, encouragement, love, and prayers
during the last few years.
I would like to apologise to those I do not mention by name here, however, I
highly valued your kind support.
I thank you all from deep in my heart!
Groningen May 20, 2006
Vo Thi Thanh Loc
iii
Abstract
In recent years, food quality and safety has become an issue of critical
importance to all food businesses. Several examples of food quality and safety
incidents have been highlighted in the media. These things have increased public
concern regarding the safety of food supply in general and high-risk products in
particular. Consumers and governments are demanding safe food, and these
demands are being passed back along each step of the food supply chain,
ultimately ending with the food producers. For different segments of the supply
chain, special Quality-Assurance (QA) programs have been developed, in
response to perceived risks, potential price premiums and customer
requirements. Such QA programs, of which the Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Points (HACCP) methodology is the most important in terms of
international trade and food quality and safety. The absence of such systems will
increasingly constitute a barrier to accessing export markets.
The present research deals with Seafood Supply Chain Quality Management -
The Shrimp Supply Chain Quality Improvement Perspective of Seafood
Companies in the Mekong Delta (Vietnam). It will show the development of a
supply chain quality management framework through a techno-managerial
approach. The framework includes measures for shrimp quality and safety
assurance (i) in primary production, such as supplier quality management and
partnerships; (ii) at company level such as quality management, especially
HACCP implementation; and (iii) at the distribution stage with focusing on
storage and transportation. In addition, the framework demonstrates roles of the
government, local agricultural departments, the Vietnam Association of Seafood
Exporters and Producers (VASEP) and The National Fisheries Quality
Assurance and Veterinary Directorate (NAFIQAVED) that are crucial for
achieving quality and safe objectives for Vietnam’s seafood in the entire chain,
especially in primary production. The products of the research also provide a
quality improvement process for the seafood companies and potential measures
to improve further product safety and quality in the chain.
Contents
Acknowledgements
Abstract
Contents
List of figures
List of tables
Glossary of Acronyms
PART 1 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1 Research Introduction 1
1.1 Common problems in global food safety and quality 1
1.2 Vietnam’s sea product problems: an overview 3
1.2.1 General introduction relating to seafood products in Vietnam 3
1.2.2 Problems relating to the quality of Vietnam’s seafood products 7
1.3 Shrimp quality control problems in the MD 10
1.3.1 Introduction 10
1.3.2 Shrimp quality control problems in the MD 12
1.4 Research objective 20
1.5 Research structure, methods and methodology 20
1.5.1 Step 1 - Research background, structure and methodology 21
1.5.2 Step 2 – Literature review 21
1.5.3 Step 3 – Company survey 21
1.5.4 Step 4 – Development of a supply chain quality management
framework 22
1.5.5 Step 5 – Testing the framework at the SFCs 22
1.5.6 Step 6 – The intra-SFC quality improvement measures 23
1.5.7 Step 7 - The chain quality improvement measures 23
1.5.8 Step 8 - Research conclusions and recommendations 24
1.6 Summary 24
vi
PART 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Chapter 2 Literature review 25
2.1 Introduction 25
2.2 The role of HACCP in ensuring food safety 27
2.2.1 The HACCP system 27
2.2.2 HACCP and other prerequisite programs 31
2.3 The role of government and industry in food safety assurance 33
2.4 Current situation of HACCP implementation in the world 36
2.4.1 HACCP and international trade 36
2.4.2 The implementation of HACCP in the world 38
2.5 Food safety constraints and problems in developing countries 41
2.5.1 Technological constraints in HACCP implementation 41
2.5.2 Managerial problems of HACCP implementation 42
2.5.3 Techno-managerial constraints of HACCP implementation
in Vietnam 43
2.6 Techno-managerial approach for food safety and quality management 44
2.6.1 Techno-managerial approach 44
2.6.2 The food quality management model by means of a
techno-managerial approach 45
2.6.3 Food supply chain management 49
2.7 Summary 49
PART 3 RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION AND PRODUCTS
Chapter 3 Seafood supply chain quality issues and discussion
in the MD 51
3.1 Data collection by questionnaire 51
3.1.1 Questionnaire design 51
3.1.2 Questionnaire contents 53
3.2 The survey results: general information 54
3.2.1 Interviewee general information 54
3.2.2 Company general information 55
3.2.3 Quality management of the interviewed SFCs 56
3.3 The role of the government and industry 58
3.4 Shrimp supply chain quality issues and resulting discussion in the MD 59
3.4.1 Hatchery production 60
3.4.2 Farm production 63
3.4.3 Catching activities 65
3.4.4 Collector/Wholesale buyer 65
3.4.5 Manufacturing process 68
vii
3.4.6 Distribution stage 72
3.5 The supply chain deficiencies in shrimp quality assurance 75
3.6 Summary 77
Chapter 4 Supply chain quality management framework 79
4.1 Shrimp quality and safety in primary production 80
4.1.1 The role of government institutes, industry and
support organizations 82
4.1.2 The role of seafood companies 83
4.2 Measures for shrimp quality management and improvement in SFCs 85
4.2.1 Quality control problems at the company level 85
4.2.2 Quality management in SFCs 85
4.2.3 Measures to improve the HACCP system 87
4.2.4 Shrimp quality and safety at the distribution stage 93
4.3 Summary 94
Chapter 5 Test of the quality management system in the MD’s
seafood companies 95
5.1 Selection of case studies and test plan 95
5.1.1 Case selection 95
5.1.2 Test plan 96
5.2 Company information and test results 97
5.2.1 General information relating to the two test companies 97
5.2.2 Quality management information of the two test companies 100
5.2.3 HACCP test results 102
5.3 Explanation and discussion of test results 104
5.3.1 Quality gaps in the companies 104
5.3.2 Deficiencies in the test company chains 109
5.4 Summary 115
Chapter 6 The seafood supply chain quality improvement 117
6.1 Introduction 117
6.2 The intra-SFC’s quality improvement measures and feedback 118
6.2.1 The intra-SFC’s quality improvement implementation process 118
6.2.2 Feedback about the SFC quality improvement implementation
Process 125
6.3 Seafood chain quality improvement measures 127
6.3.1 Feedback about chain quality improvement of the SFC meeting
participants 127
6.3.2 Chain quality improvement measures 128
6.4 Summary 134
viii
PART 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Chapter 7 Conclusions and recommendations 135
7.1 Introduction 135
7.2 The most important research findings and conclusions 135
7.2.1 Importance of HACCP systems in food quality assurance 135
7.2.2 The survey results 136
7.2.3 The seafood supply chain management framework 138
7.2.4 Test results in two case studies 138
7.2.5 The SFC quality improvement process 139
7.2.6 Chain quality improvement measures 139
7.3 Recommendations for further seafood quality improvement 140
7.3.1 Recommendations for the test companies 140
7.3.2 Recommendations at chain level 141
7.3.3 Managerial recommendations 141
7.3.4 Technological recommendations 143
7.4 General situations of SFCs in the MD and the test companies
at present (2006) 144
7.5 Recommendations for further research 144
REFERENCES 147
APPENDICES
1. Questionnaire to interview SFC 161
2. Coding 179
3. List of the seafood companies 181
4. List of the interviewees 185
5. The situation of the world’s, Vietnam’s and the MD’s
seafood markets 189
6. HACCP procedure and principles and supplier selection criteria 205
7. Test plan and test result tables 213
8. Questions for chain actors’ interviews 225
SUMMARY IN ENGLISH 229
SUMMARY IN DUTCH 231
SUMMARY IN VIETNAMESE 233
ix
List of figures
Figure 1.1 Maps of Vietnam and the South of Vietnam 5
Figure 1.2 The structure of Vietnam’s SFC organization 6
Figure 1.3 The supply chain quality management of interviewed SFCs 13
Figure 1.4 The fish chain in the Netherlands 14
Figure 1.5 The shrimp chain in the MD 15
Figure 1.6 The life cycle of the black tiger shrimp 16
Figure 2.1 Different approaches to food quality management 45
Figure 2.2 Food quality management model (Luning, et al., 2002) 46
Figure 2.3 Common QAS schematically mapped according to their
technological and management focus 47
Figure 3.1 Questionnaire design process 52
Figure 3.2 Managerial structure of the Fisheries Ministry regarding
fishery safety and protection 59
Figure 3.3 The HACCP and the role of government in the shrimp chain
in the MD 60
Figure 3.4 Shrimp problems in hatchery and farm productions 62
Figure 3.5 Shrimp problems at the collector/wholesale buyer stage 67
Figure 3.6 Shrimp problems in the manufacturing process 69
Figure 3.7 Shrimp problems in Distribution stage 73
Figure 3.8 Supply chain deficiencies in shrimp quality assurance 75
Figure 4.1 Seafood Supply Chain Quality Management Framework 81
Figure 4.2 Tools for supplier quality management 84
Figure 5.1 Some examples of shrimp products from Company A 99
Figure 5.2 Some examples of shrimp products from Company B 100
Figure 6.1 The quality improvement implementation process 119
Figure 6.2 The seafood supply chain factors 126
Figure 7.1 Managerial levels, knowledge and skills 143
x
List of tables
Table 1.1 Top ten export SFCs in 2002 11
Table 1.2 Factors affecting shrimp product quality 12
Table 3.1 General information about the companies interviewed 55
Table 3.2 Leadership related to QM of interviewed companies 56
Table 3.3 Data set for flow diagrams of SFCs 70
Table 3.4 The percentage of SFCs that have established CCPs 71
Table 5.1 Main characteristics of selected cases in terms of the indicators 96
Table 5.2 General information relating to the test companies 98
Table 5.3 Chain information for the companies 100
Table 5.4 HACCP test results 102
Table 6.1 The interview schedule and tools 129
Table 6.2 The relation of chain problems, interview topics and
chain factors 130
xi
Glossary of Acronyms
BRC British Retail Consortium
CCP Critical Control Points
DF Department of Fisheries
DST Department of Science and Technology
EC Extension Centre
EU European Union
FRDP Fisheries Resource Development & Protection
FS Food Safety
GHP Good Hygiene Practices
GMP Good Manufacturing Practice
HACCP Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
HCMC Ho Chi Minh City
ICMSF International Commission of Microbiological Specifications for
Foods
ISO International Standard Organization
MBV Monodon Basulovirus
MD Mekong Delta
NACMCF National Advisory Committee for Microbiological Criteria for
Foods
NAFIQACEN National Fisheries Inspection and Quality Assurance Centre
NAFIQAVED National Fisheries Quality Assurance and Veterinary
Directorate
OASIS Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information
Standards
PL15 Size of shrimp seed ready for the farmers to breed
QA Quality Assurance
QC Quality Control
QM Quality Management
SCM Supply Chain Management
SEAPRODEX Sea Product Import-Export Corporation
SFCs Seafood Companies
SOEs State Owned Enterprises
SQF Safe Quality Food
SSOP Sanitation Standard Operation Procedures
SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
TQM Total Quality Management
US United States
USDA United State Department of Agriculture
xii
VASEP Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers
VCCI Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry
WHO World Health Organization
WSD White Spot Disease
YHD Yellow Heat Disease
Chapter 1
Research Introduction
At present (2002), Vietnam’s seafood products in general and shrimp products
in particular face many quality control challenges throughout the product range
– particularly in export markets. Incomplete quality control during the primary
production has caused hazardous infections in raw materials. The lack of strict
quality management and modern technological investments during processing
and distribution, especially the insufficient application of Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Points (HACCP), continues to lead to hazardous infection in
final products. As a result, Vietnam’s seafood products do not meet customer
requirements and expectations with respect to product quality. This is one of the
reasons why research on quality control management in the seafood supply
chain – the Shrimp Supply Chain Quality Improvement Perspective for Seafood
Companies (SFCs) in the Mekong Delta (MD), Vietnam – is being conducted.
Chapter 1 will describe in more detail the present seafood situation in Vietnam.
More specifically, it will present the background and necessary information for
establishing research problems, the research objective, the research structure,
methods, and methodology. The changes of these situations in the coming years
will be discussed in a Section 7.4 of Chapter 7.
1.1 Common problems in global food safety and quality
Food quality assurance is now recognized as essential for an efficient and
internationally competitive business. International markets demand that all steps
in the food supply chain take customer and consumer preferences fully into
account, that suppliers meet tighter food hygiene and safety standards, and
assure constant quality. Indications are that world food suppliers will be required
to provide food safety and quality assurances by the year 2010. Global trends
that have an impact on food safety and quality assurance can be summarized as
follows (Vietnam Economic Review, 2002):
• The demand for food is at the cost of economic growth;
Chapter 1
2
• The demand for ‘safe food’ is increasing;
• The demand for ‘quality assured’ food is increasing;
• Business structures are changing; and
• Food-borne illnesses occur more frequently.
The World Health Organization (WHO) reports a rising number of food-borne
illnesses in industrialized countries. The po