The present study investigated the implementation of explicit reading strategy
instruction for Vietnamese non-English major tertiary students. It first explored the
students‘ use of reading strategies in reading English level 3 texts before and after the
explicit strategy instruction (ESI). Also, it explored the students‘ perceptions of the
instruction. The study was a mixed-method design to explore how Vietnamese non-
English major students perceived the impacts of strategy instruction on reading
comprehension. Data were collected from forty-five non-English major students at a
university in Vietnam by means of questionnaires, group interviews and learning
reflections. First, one questionnaire about reported reading strategies use was
administered to 45 non-English major tertiary students in one class before the
intervention. Then the instruction was conducted for 6 weeks in which students were
taught explicitly previewing and predicting, skimming, scanning, guessing meaning of
the unknown words from the context and summarizing strategies. After the instruction,
students completed the same questionnaire again. Three semi-structured interviews
were conducted in groups of three to four students, and thirty-nine learning reflections
were collected to obtain in-depth information about the impact of the ESI. The
findings revealed that Vietnamese non-English major tertiary students used different
reading strategy categories in reading English level 3 texts from medium to high levels
before the instruction. Specifically, global strategies were preferred in the pre-reading
stage whereas problem-solving and local strategies were reported to be used more
frequently in the while- reading and post-reading stages. After the instruction, they
also reported using various reading strategies in four strategy categories namely
problem- solving, global, support and local strategies from a medium to high
frequency. In addition, the ESI was perceived to be cognitively beneficial, through
students‘ reported heightened awareness of using reading strategies in reading
comprehension, expanded reading strategy repertoire, greater reading fluency, and
higher reading score. From a non-cognitive affective perspective, students reported
that the ESI motivated them to read, and read with a higher level of confidence, and
become more autonomous in reading in English.
The study offers implications for teachers, students and materials writers in
teaching and learning the English reading skill in non-English major learning contexts
and perhaps in other settings.
203 trang |
Chia sẻ: Đào Thiềm | Ngày: 13/01/2024 | Lượt xem: 217 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Thesis Explicit reading strategy instruction for vietnamese non-english major tertiary students, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HUE UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
HUYNH THI LONG HA
EXPLICIT READING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION
FOR VIETNAMESE NON-ENGLISH MAJOR TERTIARY STUDENTS
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THESIS IN THEORY AND
METHODOLOGY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING
HUE, 2022
BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
ĐẠI HỌC HUẾ
TRƢỜNG ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ
HUỲNH THỊ LONG HÀ
HƢỚNG DẪN TRỰC TIẾP CÁCH SỬ DỤNG CÁC CHIẾN
LƢỢC ĐỌC HIỂU CHO SINH VIÊN TIẾNG ANH KHÔNG
CHUYÊN BẬC ĐẠI HỌC TẠI VIỆT NAM
MÃ SỐ: 9 14 01 11
LUẬN ÁN TIẾN SĨ
LÝ LUẬN VÀ PHƢƠNG PHÁP DẠY HỌC BỘ MÔN TIẾNG ANH
NGƯỜI HƯỚNG DẪN KHOA HỌC
TS. Nguyễn Thị Bảo Trang
TS. Trƣơng Bạch Lê
HUẾ, NĂM 2022
i
DECLARATION
I certify that the present dissertation submitted today entitled:
“EXPLICIT READING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION
FOR VIETNAMESE NON-ENGLISH MAJOR TERTIARY STUDENTS”
for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in theory and methodology in English
language teaching, has been composed solely by myself and that it has not been
submitted, in whole or in part, in any previous application for a degree, contains no
material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree in any institute,
college, or university, and previously published or written by another person, except
where due reference is made in the text of the dissertation.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper and the research process behind it would not have been possible
without the exceptional support of my supervisors, Doctor Nguyen Thi Bao Trang and
Doctor Truong Bach Le, who provided instruction, feedback and encouragement to
various steps of the study and to various versions of this dissertation with the
support and words of wisdom. I was exceptionally fortunate to have them as
mentors for this work. Their long- lasting patience, enthusiasm, knowledge and exacting
attention to detail have been an inspiration and kept my work on track from my first
encounter to the final draft of this paper. They have devoted their heart and mind to
support me, understood my difficulties, sympathized my circumstances and
accompanied me to the end of the PhD journey. Without their invaluable guidance and
scholarly advice, this work would not have taken its final shape.
I would also like to extend my sincere gratitude to teachers, lecturers and
professors of University of Foreign Languages and Foreign Studies, Hue University
for patiently and wholeheartedly guiding me through the process required to complete
my program of study. Their support, encouragement, and willingness to serve as
academic committee members were of huge benefit to me.
I also owe many thanks to my colleagues and best friends who offered me their
generous assistance of review the tests, transcribing the interviews, translating the
questionnaire, interviews and learning reflections and coding the data for double check.
Their ongoing support concerning the study contributed to my success. A special
mention also goes to my colleagues whose understanding, sympathy, and support were
invaluable spiritual strength for me during the process of completing this work.
I am also immensely grateful to the non- English major students who took part in
the intervention for both pilot and main study.
I am particularly indebted to my parents, my mother-in-law, my husband, my
two sisters and my two children for their understanding, support and compassion
throughout the years of study. Without the constant financially and spiritually support
of my parents and my mother-in-law, I hardly complete my PhD journey. My heartfelt
gratitude also goes to my husband for his spiritual support and empathy for my hard
work and sometimes my irritation when I got stuck with the study. I would like to
express my special thanks to my daughter, Khanh Ngoc and my son, Tri Dung, for
becoming more independent of their learning and tolerant of my various times of
absence from family gatherings. The love and encouragement of my family gave me
strength and determination to complete the study.
iii
Abstract
The present study investigated the implementation of explicit reading strategy
instruction for Vietnamese non-English major tertiary students. It first explored the
students‘ use of reading strategies in reading English level 3 texts before and after the
explicit strategy instruction (ESI). Also, it explored the students‘ perceptions of the
instruction. The study was a mixed-method design to explore how Vietnamese non-
English major students perceived the impacts of strategy instruction on reading
comprehension. Data were collected from forty-five non-English major students at a
university in Vietnam by means of questionnaires, group interviews and learning
reflections. First, one questionnaire about reported reading strategies use was
administered to 45 non-English major tertiary students in one class before the
intervention. Then the instruction was conducted for 6 weeks in which students were
taught explicitly previewing and predicting, skimming, scanning, guessing meaning of
the unknown words from the context and summarizing strategies. After the instruction,
students completed the same questionnaire again. Three semi-structured interviews
were conducted in groups of three to four students, and thirty-nine learning reflections
were collected to obtain in-depth information about the impact of the ESI. The
findings revealed that Vietnamese non-English major tertiary students used different
reading strategy categories in reading English level 3 texts from medium to high levels
before the instruction. Specifically, global strategies were preferred in the pre-reading
stage whereas problem-solving and local strategies were reported to be used more
frequently in the while- reading and post-reading stages. After the instruction, they
also reported using various reading strategies in four strategy categories namely
problem- solving, global, support and local strategies from a medium to high
frequency. In addition, the ESI was perceived to be cognitively beneficial, through
students‘ reported heightened awareness of using reading strategies in reading
comprehension, expanded reading strategy repertoire, greater reading fluency, and
higher reading score. From a non-cognitive affective perspective, students reported
that the ESI motivated them to read, and read with a higher level of confidence, and
become more autonomous in reading in English.
The study offers implications for teachers, students and materials writers in
teaching and learning the English reading skill in non-English major learning contexts
and perhaps in other settings.
iv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CEFR : The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages
EFL : English as a foreign language
ESL : English as a second language
L1 : First language/ the mother tongue
L2 : Second language
M : Mean (value)
MOET : Ministry of Education and Training
N : Number
NFLP : Vietnam‘s National Foreign Languages Project
QUAN : Quantitative
QUAL : Qualitative
SPSS : Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
S.D : Standard deviation
ESI : Explicit strategy instruction
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION ........................................................................................................... i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... ii
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................v
LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... ix
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................x
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................1
1.1. Background context of the study ........................................................................1
1.2. Rationale of the study .........................................................................................3
1.3. Purpose of the study and research questions ......................................................5
1.4. Scope of the Study ..............................................................................................6
1.5. Significance of the study ....................................................................................6
1.6. Structure of the study .........................................................................................7
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................9
2.1. Definitions of key terms .....................................................................................9
2.2. Reading and reading comprehension in a second language (L2) .....................10
2.2.1. Reading in a second language ................................................................10
2.2.2. Reading comprehension in a second language .......................................11
2.3. Processes in L2 reading ....................................................................................13
2.3.1. Bottom-up model ....................................................................................13
2.3.2. Top-down model ....................................................................................14
2.3.3. Interactive model ....................................................................................15
2.4. Reading strategies .............................................................................................19
2.4.1. Definitions of reading strategies ............................................................19
2.4.2 The role of reading strategies ..................................................................21
2.4.3 Categorizations of reading strategies ......................................................21
2.5. Strategy instruction and EFL reading ...............................................................25
2.5.1. Strategy instruction .................................................................................25
2.5.2. Rationale for the instruction ...................................................................27
2.5.3. Explicit reading strategy instruction versus implicit reading strategy
instruction .........................................................................................................28
vi
2.6. Description of the strategy instruction procedures ...........................................29
2.6.1. Strategy instruction models ....................................................................29
2.6.2. Strategy instructional process .................................................................31
2.6.3. The framework and focus of the instruction ..........................................33
2.6.4. Materials for the instruction ...................................................................35
2.7. Previous research on reading strategies ...........................................................36
2.7.1. Descriptive research ...............................................................................36
2.7.2. Experimental research ............................................................................39
2.8. Summary of the chapter ...................................................................................46
CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ......................................................47
3.1. Research approach and research design ...........................................................47
3.1.1. Research approach ..................................................................................47
3.1.2. Research design ......................................................................................49
3.2. Research Setting and Sample ...........................................................................51
3.2.1. Research setting ......................................................................................51
3.2.2. Participants .............................................................................................51
3.2.3. The role of the researcher .......................................................................54
3.3. Research instruments ........................................................................................54
3.3.1. Questionnaire ..........................................................................................55
3.3.2. Interview .................................................................................................60
3.3.3. Learning reflections ................................................................................62
3.4. Research procedures .........................................................................................63
3.4.1. Phase:1 Pre instruction ...........................................................................64
3.4.2. Phase 2: The instruction .........................................................................66
3.4.3. Phase 3: Post- instruction .......................................................................67
3.5. Data analysis .....................................................................................................70
3.5.1. Analysis of the questionnaire data .........................................................70
3.5.2 Analysis of interviews and learning reflections ......................................70
3.6. Summary of the research methods ...................................................................73
3.7. Ethical considerations .......................................................................................73
3.8. Validity .............................................................................................................74
3.9. Reliability .........................................................................................................75
3.10. Summary of the chapter .................................................................................76
vii
CHAPTER 4 FINDINGS ............................................................................................77
4.1. Students‘ reported use of reading strategies before the explicit strategy
instruction (ESI) ......................................................................................................77
4.1.1. Overall use of reading strategies before the explicit strategy instruction
(ESI) .................................................................................................................77
4.1.2. Pre-reading strategies use .......................................................................78
4.1.3. While-reading strategies use before instruction .....................................81
4.1.4. Post- reading strategies use before instruction .......................................83
4.2. Impact of the explicit reading strategy instruction ...........................................85
4.2.1. Impacts on the use of reading strategies as reported in the questionnaire ....85
4.2.2. Students‘ perceptions on the impact of explicit strategy instruction .....94
4.3. Summary of the chapter ................................................................................ 111
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION ................................................................................... 112
5.1. Students‘ use of reading strategies in reading English level 3 texts before
instruction ............................................................................................................. 113
5.1.1. Overall reading strategy use before instruction................................... 113
5.1.2. Pre- reading strategies use before instruction ..................................... 114
5.1.3. While- reading strategies use before instruction ................................. 115
5.1.4. Post- reading strategy use before instruction ...................................... 118
5.2. The impacts of the explicit reading strategy instruction ............................... 119
5.2.1. Impact on the use of reading strategies as reported in the questionnaire .. 119
5.2.2. Impact of the instruction on cognitive reading processes and affective
values as reported from interviews and reflections ....................................... 123
5.3. Summary of the chapter ................................................................................ 130
CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS ....................................... 132
6.1. Key Findings and Conclusion ....................................................................... 132
6.2. Implications ................................................................................................... 134
6.2.1. Implications for teachers and classroom teaching............................... 134
6.2.2. Implications for students ..................................................................... 135
6.2.3. Implications for English materials writers .......................................... 136
6.3. Contributions of the study ............................................................................. 136
6.3.1. Theoretical contributions ..................................................................... 136
6.3.2. Methodological contributions ............................................................. 137
6.3.3. Practical contributions ......................................................................... 138
viii
6.4. Limitations of the study ................................................................................. 138
6.5. Recommendations for further research ......................................................... 139
6.6. Final thoughts ................................................................................................ 140
LISTS OF AUTHOR’S WORK .............................................................................. 141
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 142
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
APPENDIX F
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1. Definitions of reading strategies...................................................................20
Table 2.2. Framework for reading strategies instruction ...............................................34
Table 2.3. Focus of the instruction ................................................................................35
Table 3.1. Participants‘ age and gender.........................................................................52
Table 3.2. Grade levels of participants‘ English learning starting time ........................53
Table 3.3. Participants‘ home and school location ........................................................53
Table 3.4. Description of reading strategy categories in SORS ....................................57
Table 3.5. The questionnaire design ..............................................................................59
Table 3.6. The reliability of the pilot questionnaire .....................................................65
Table 3.7. The reliability of the official questionnaire ..................................................65
Table 3.8. Summary of the Research Methods ...................................