This study analyzes the perspectives of teachers as well as learners regarding
the elements that influence the oral fluency of students majoring in English at
university levels. In addition to this, it investigates the evaluations made by EFL
teachers regarding the probable factors that could affect the speaking fluency of EFL
students. The study was a mixed-method sequential explanatory model (Creswell &
Clark, 2007). Using a questionnaire consisting of 32 questions, data were gathered
from 115 EFL students and 45 EFL teachers studying and teaching at universities in
Vietnam. Six in-depth interviews with a semi-structured format were carried out. The
findings revealed that both EFL teachers and students were knowledgeable about
factors contributing to the speaking fluency of EFL students. To be more specific, they
were almost unanimous in their opinion that instructional and motivational elements
are among the most influential ones, but task type was the factor that had the least
amount of impact. Their comments, on the other hand, did not completely and
accurately reflect their perceptions. EFL teachers displayed positive opinions
regarding instructional aspects, despite the fact that they put forth a lot of effort to
improve their teaching methodology. On the one hand, the evaluations of the students
were affected by effective factors, among which motivational and instructional factors
were among the most prominent. From the findings, methodological and pedagogical
implications are made for improvements to LOF in teaching and learning EFL in
higher education.
213 trang |
Chia sẻ: Đào Thiềm | Ngày: 14/01/2024 | Lượt xem: 355 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Luận án An investigation into efl teachers’ and students’ perspective on factors influencing oral fluency in the context of the university in vietnam, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
HUE UNIVERSITY
VO NGUYEN DA THAO
AN INVESTIGATION INTO EFL TEACHERS’ AND
STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON FACTORS INFLUENCING
ORAL FLUENCY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE UNIVERSITY
IN VIETNAM
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THESIS IN THEORY AND METHODOLOGY
OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING
HUE, 2023
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
HUE UNIVERSITY
VO NGUYEN DA THAO
AN INVESTIGATION INTO EFL TEACHERS’ AND
STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON FACTORS INFLUENCING
ORAL FLUENCY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE UNIVERSITY
IN VIETNAM
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THESIS IN THEORY AND METHODOLOGY
OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING
CODE: 9140111
SUPERVISOR:
Assoc. Prof. Dr. TRAN VAN PHUOC
Dr. TRAN QUANG HAI
HUE, 2023
BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
ĐẠI HỌC HUẾ
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ
VÕ NGUYÊN DẠ THẢO
NGHIÊN CỨU NHẬN THỨC CỦA GIÁO VIÊN VÀ SINH VIÊN
VỀ CÁC YẾU TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG ĐẾN VIỆC NÓI TIẾNG ANH
LƯU LOÁT Ở TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC TẠI VIỆT NAM
LUẬN ÁN TIẾN SĨ
LÝ LUẬN VÀ PHƯƠNG PHÁP DẠY HỌC BỘ MÔN TIẾNG ANH
HUẾ, 2023
BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
ĐẠI HỌC HUẾ
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ
NGHIÊN CỨU NHẬN THỨC CỦA GIÁO VIÊN VÀ SINH VIÊN
VỀ CÁC YẾU TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG ĐẾN VIỆC NÓI TIẾNG ANH
LƯU LOÁT Ở TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC TẠI VIỆT NAM
LUẬN ÁN TIẾN SĨ
LÝ LUẬN VÀ PHƯƠNG PHÁP DẠY HỌC BỘ MÔN TIẾNG ANH
MÃ SỐ: 9140111
NGƯỜI HƯỚNG DẪN KHOA HỌC:
PGS.TS. TRẦN VĂN PHƯỚC
TS.TRẦN QUANG HẢI
HUẾ, 2023
ABSTRACT
This study analyzes the perspectives of teachers as well as learners regarding
the elements that influence the oral fluency of students majoring in English at
university levels. In addition to this, it investigates the evaluations made by EFL
teachers regarding the probable factors that could affect the speaking fluency of EFL
students. The study was a mixed-method sequential explanatory model (Creswell &
Clark, 2007). Using a questionnaire consisting of 32 questions, data were gathered
from 115 EFL students and 45 EFL teachers studying and teaching at universities in
Vietnam. Six in-depth interviews with a semi-structured format were carried out. The
findings revealed that both EFL teachers and students were knowledgeable about
factors contributing to the speaking fluency of EFL students. To be more specific, they
were almost unanimous in their opinion that instructional and motivational elements
are among the most influential ones, but task type was the factor that had the least
amount of impact. Their comments, on the other hand, did not completely and
accurately reflect their perceptions. EFL teachers displayed positive opinions
regarding instructional aspects, despite the fact that they put forth a lot of effort to
improve their teaching methodology. On the one hand, the evaluations of the students
were affected by effective factors, among which motivational and instructional factors
were among the most prominent. From the findings, methodological and pedagogical
implications are made for improvements to LOF in teaching and learning EFL in
higher education.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................... i
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... v
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................... viii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1
1.1. Background of the study ........................................................................................... 1
1.2. Statement of the problem .......................................................................................... 2
1.3. Purpose of the study ................................................................................................. 2
1.4. Research questions ................................................................................................... 3
1.6. Significance of the study .......................................................................................... 5
1.7. Definitions of key terms ........................................................................................... 7
CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF LITERATURE ........................................................... 11
2.1. Overview of teaching speaking and speaking in Vietnam ..................................... 11
2.2. Theoretical background .......................................................................................... 15
2.2.2 Accuracy .............................................................................................................. 17
2.2.3.1. Fluency as proficiency ...................................................................................... 22
2.2.3.2. Utterance fluency .............................................................................................. 24
2.2.3.3 Cognitive fluency .............................................................................................. 24
2.2.3.4. L2 perceived fluency ........................................................................................ 25
2.2.4. Segalowitz’s framework for L2 fluency .............................................................. 26
2.2.5. L2 Oral fluency factors ........................................................................................ 27
2.2.5.1. Motivation ........................................................................................................ 29
2.2.5.2. Behavior and attitude ........................................................................................ 29
2.2.5.3. Tasks ................................................................................................................. 30
2.2.5.4. Instructions ....................................................................................................... 31
2.2.5.5. Exposure to English .......................................................................................... 33
2.2.6. Peer Interaction .................................................................................................... 33
ii
2.2.7 Communicative competence ................................................................................ 35
2.2.8 Fluency development ............................................................................................ 39
2.2.9. Summary of Theoretical Framework................................................................... 41
2.3. Previous studies ...................................................................................................... 42
2.4 The Gaps in the Literature ....................................................................................... 59
2.5. Summary ................................................................................................................. 60
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 62
3.1. Research Paradigm ................................................................................................. 62
3.2. Research design ...................................................................................................... 64
3.3. Participants ............................................................................................................. 67
3.4. Data collection instruments .................................................................................... 70
3.4.1. Questionnaires for teachers and students ............................................................ 72
3.4.2. Semi-structured interviews for teachers and students ......................................... 74
3.5. Data collection procedure ....................................................................................... 78
3.5.1. Piloting the questionnaires .................................................................................. 78
3.5.2. Piloting the semi-structured interview ................................................................ 79
3.5.3. Administering questionnaires .............................................................................. 80
3.5.4. Administering the semi-structured interview ...................................................... 82
3.6. Data analysis procedures ........................................................................................ 83
3.7. Reliability and Validity .......................................................................................... 85
3.8. Ethical Considerations ............................................................................................ 86
3.9. Summary ................................................................................................................. 87
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ....................................................... 88
4.1. Findings .................................................................................................................. 88
4.1.1. The quantitative analysis of teachers’ and students’ perspectives on LOF ......... 88
4.1.1.1. The descriptive analysis of teachers’ perspectives on LOF ............................. 89
4.1.1.2 The descriptive analysis of students’ perspectives on LOF .............................. 90
4.1.2. The qualitative analysis of teachers’ and students’ perspectives on LOF ........... 91
4.1.3. The overall analysis of teachers’ and students’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF
....................................................................................................................................... 95
iii
4.1.3.1. The overal analysis of teachers’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF...... 96
4.1.3.2. The overal analysis of students’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF...... 97
4.1.4 The quantitative analysis of teachers’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF . 98
4.1.4.1. Behavior and attitude factors ............................................................................ 99
4.1.4.3. Tasks Factors .................................................................................................. 101
4.1.4.4. Instructional Factors ....................................................................................... 102
4.1.4.5. Exposure Factors ............................................................................................ 103
4.1.6. The descriptive analysis of students’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF
..................................................................................................................................... 105
4.1.6.1. Behavior and attitude factors .......................................................................... 106
4.1.6.2. Motivational Factors ....................................................................................... 107
4.1.6.3. Tasks Factors .................................................................................................. 108
4.1.6.4. Instructional Factors ....................................................................................... 109
4.1.6.5. Exposure Factors ............................................................................................ 110
4.1.7. The qualitative analysis of students’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF 111
4.2. Discussions ........................................................................................................... 112
4.2.1. LOF from EFL students’ and teachers’ perspectives ........................................ 112
4.2.2 Teachers’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF ........................................... 113
4.2.3. Students’ perspectives on factors influencing LOF .......................................... 114
4.2.4. Teachers' and students' perspectives on factors influencing LOF ..................... 115
4.3. The summary ........................................................................................................ 120
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION ................................................................................. 122
5.1. Summary of the Study .......................................................................................... 122
5.2. Summary of the Findings ..................................................................................... 122
5.3. Limitations of the study ........................................................................................ 124
5.4. Implications and contributions of the study ......................................................... 124
5.5. Recommendations for Future Research................................................................ 126
5.6 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 127
LISTS OF AUTHOR’S WORK PAPERS .............................................................. 128
1. The impacts of motivation and task types on L2 oral fluency development in higher
iv
education in Vietnam ................................................................................................... 128
2. The impacts of technology on the development of L2 oral fluency in higher
education in Vietnam. .................................................................................................. 128
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 129
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ 150
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1. Summary of the student participants’ personal information ........................ 69
Table 3.2. Summary of the teacher participants’ personal information ........................ 69
Table 3.3. How data were collected for this study. ....................................................... 71
Table 3.4. Summary of the Questionnaire Instrument with closed-ended items for
quantitative data ............................................................................................................. 73
Table 3.5. Interview questions for teachers and students .............................................. 76
Table 3.6. Coding for interviewing teacher participants ............................................... 77
Table 3.7. Coding for interviewing student participants ............................................... 77
Table 3.8. The reliability of teachers’ pilot questionnaire ............................................ 79
Table 3.9. The reliability of students’ pilot questionnaire ............................................ 79
Table 3.10. The reliability of the official questionnaire- Teachers ............................... 80
Table 3.11. The reliability of the official questionnaire- Students ................................ 80
Table 3.12. The reliability of the theme - Teachers ...................................................... 81
Table 3.13. The reliability of the theme - Students ....................................................... 82
Table 4.1. EFL students’ and teachers’ perspectives towards LOF .............................. 88
Table 4.2. EFL teachers’ perspectives towards the importance of LOF ....................... 89
Table 4.3. EFL students’ perspectives towards the importance of LOF ....................... 90
Table 4.4. Summary of the Themes for Interview Question One - Teachers ............... 91
Table 4.5. The summary of emergent themes from students’ responses. ..................... 92
Table 4.6. Summary of the Themes for Interview Question One - Teachers ............... 93
Table 4.7. Summary of the Themes for Interview Question One - students ................. 94
Table 4.8. EFL teachers’ and students’ perspectives towards factors influencing LOF
....................................................................................................................................... 95
Table 4.9. EFL teachers’ perspectives towards factors influencing LOF ..................... 96
Table 4.10. EFL students’ attitudes towards factors influencing LOF ......................... 97
Table 4.11. EFL teachers’ attitudes towards Student Behavior and Attitude factors ... 99
Table 4.12. EFL teachers’ attitudes towards Motivational factors.............................. 100
Table 4.14. EFL teachers’ attitudes towards Tasksactors ........................................... 101
vi
Table 4.15. EFL teachers’ attitudes towards Instructional factors .............................. 102
Table 4.17. EFL teachers’ attitudes towards Exposure factors ................................... 103
Table 4.19. EFL students’ attitudes towards Behavior and Attitude Factors .............. 106
Table 4.20. EFL students’ attitudes towards Motivational Factors ............................. 107
Table 4.21. EFL students’ attitudes towards Tasks factors ......................................... 108
Table 4.22. EFL students’ attitudes towards Instructional factors .............................. 109
Table 4.23. EFL Students’ attitudes towards Exposure factors .................................. 110
Table 4.24. Summary of the Themes for Interview Question four - students ............. 111
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1. Aspects of L2 fluency – Segalowitz’s model ............................................. 21
Figure 2.2. The framework of oral fluency factors ....................................................... 26
Figure 3.1. Four elements of research design ................................................................ 64
viii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CLT
EMI
ELT
Communicative Language Teaching
English Medium Instruction
English Language Teaching
IELTS International English Language Testing System
L2 Foreign Language or Second Language
LOF L2 oral fluency
MOET
MALS
Ministry of Education and Training
Mobile Application for Listening and Speaking
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
TEFL Teaching English as a Foreign Language
TBLT
TL
Task-Based Language Teaching
Target Language
SD Standard Deviation
SLA Second Language Acquisition
SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the study
Internationalization has emerged as a prevalent trend in the globalizing world of
higher education in an effort to recruit a more diverse student population and facilitate
global, regional, and domestic institutional competition for students (Wallitsch, 2014).
English is often recognized as the major language of communication for people in many
regions of the world as it continues to grow in importance as the most extensively used
international language (Chen, 2009). Additionally, many individuals today use English in
many social contexts and for a variety of communication styles throughout the world (e.g.,
academic settings and workplace environments). The need to reconceptualize traditional
notions in language teaching and learning such as ‘fluency’ is therefore more necessary
than finding the most efficient teaching pedagogical technique that can be applicable to
all teaching and learning contexts (Jacobs & Renandya, 2016, p. 4). Therefore, rather
than emphasizing propositional knowledge (knowledge of what or language norms and
conventions), EFL instructors should focus on establishing procedural knowledge in
their classes (Cana